Erying Polestar H770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemErying Polestar H770  (all builds)
MotherboardERYING Polestar HX ATX D5
Memory3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 17:39
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 63.6
1-Core 211
2-Core 423
117% 233 Pts
4-Core 795
8-Core 1,309
128% 1,052 Pts
64-Core 2,881
178% 2,881 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Zotac(19DA 1717) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 198
Parallax 218
174% 210 fps
MRender 302
Gravity 170
Splatting 127
155% 200 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 154%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 906 906 886 892 904 899 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,827
Write 973
Mixed 861
SusWrite 899
253% 1,140 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 48.9
206% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,490
DQ Write 849
DQ Mixed 994
787% 1,111 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 242%
Great: 372%
Maxsun 2TB SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4042 3911 3971 3821 4018 3991 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
438% Outstanding
Read 795
Write 112
Mixed 2,876
SusWrite 3959
444% 1,936 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 95.4
336% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,622
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 1,267
975% 1,339 MB/s
Poor: 267%
This bench: 438%
Great: 629%
SSD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: V1128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 420 425 423 429 429 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 429
Mixed 404
SusWrite 427
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 28
130% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 51.1
89% 168 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 137%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.1
Write 22.9
Mixed 15
29% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.6
164% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PUSKILL PSK-D5D46M5600B-32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
135% Outstanding
MC Read 50.5
MC Write 55
MC Mixed 51.7
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 47.2
SC Mixed 26.9
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 177%
This bench: 135%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 34" 1280 720 HPN374B HP M34d WQHD
Typical Polestar H770 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

System: Erying Polestar H770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback