Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive379% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 03:20
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 180
2-Core 360
114% 212 Pts
4-Core 713
8-Core 1,408
125% 1,061 Pts
64-Core 1,667
103% 1,667 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 120
Parallax 140
121% 136 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 135
Splatting 109
116% 147 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 116%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230406a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3430 2008 690 649 641 630 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 4,187
Write 4,061
Mixed 3,082
SusWrite 1,342
709% 3,168 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 79.4
257% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,440
DQ Write 805
DQ Mixed 1,210
877% 1,152 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 379%
Great: 520%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
117GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1468 1560 1671 1682 1676 1666 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2,452
Write 1,802
Mixed 1,392
SusWrite 1,620
406% 1,817 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 68.9
225% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,476
DQ Write 1,149
DQ Mixed 1,280
966% 1,302 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 325%
Great: 393%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 480GB
154GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 303 83 60 68 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 502
Write 448
Mixed 431
SusWrite 162
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 36.8
143% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 127
144% 243 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 87%
Great: 102%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
346GB free
Firmware: 731120WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2149 2134 2143 2142 1074 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,365
Write 2,211
Mixed 2,026
SusWrite 1,678
466% 2,070 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 74.1
249% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,881
DQ Write 1,421
DQ Mixed 1524
1,174% 1,609 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 347%
Great: 623%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
355GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 178 176 175 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 132
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 173
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
378% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 38.6
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 34.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 44.1
103% 36.1 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 120 23.8" 1920 1009 ACR082E XV240Y
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback