Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 02:57
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 181
2-Core 359
114% 212 Pts
4-Core 708
8-Core 1,396
124% 1,052 Pts
64-Core 1,644
102% 1,644 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 120
Parallax 140
122% 136 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 135
Splatting 109
115% 146 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 116%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230406a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3413 2096 670 639 630 626 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 4,010
Write 4,056
Mixed 2,935
SusWrite 1,346
691% 3,087 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 78.7
254% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,456
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 1217
882% 1,158 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 372%
Great: 520%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
117GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1403 1493 1447 1438 1516 1635 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,436
Write 1,639
Mixed 1,333
SusWrite 1,489
385% 1,724 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 67.8
220% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,472
DQ Write 1105
DQ Mixed 1,245
943% 1274 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 314%
Great: 393%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 480GB
156GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 390 385 386 192 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 449
Mixed 428
SusWrite 304
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 34.3
143% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 112
131% 221 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 102%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
382GB free
Firmware: 731120WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2003 1998 1991 2054 2080 967 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2,451
Write 2180
Mixed 1,936
SusWrite 1,849
473% 2,104 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 69.5
240% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 1,707
DQ Write 1,381
DQ Mixed 1,497
1,134% 1,529 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 354%
Great: 623%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
355GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 170 170 171 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 133
Write 89.2
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 170
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 38.8
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 35.5
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 44.3
105% 36.6 GB/s
Latency 52.7
76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 107%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 23 120 23.8" 1920 1009 ACR082E XV240Y
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback