Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 02:10
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 177
2-Core 349
112% 208 Pts
4-Core 696
8-Core 1338
121% 1,017 Pts
64-Core 1,605
99% 1,605 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 121
Parallax 141
95% 126 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 136
Splatting 109
115% 146 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230406a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3418 2170 684 643 634 622 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 3,847
Write 3,820
Mixed 2,907
SusWrite 1,362
668% 2984 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 70.7
228% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,379
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 1,137
793% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 351%
Great: 520%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
117GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 1477 1460 1503 1556 1590 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,320
Write 1,718
Mixed 1,352
SusWrite 1,494
385% 1,721 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 63.3
208% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1465
DQ Write 1,086
DQ Mixed 1,220
927% 1257 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 305%
Great: 393%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 480GB
156GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 388 387 281 84 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 446
Mixed 425
SusWrite 266
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 32.9
137% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 112
131% 220 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 102%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
382GB free
Firmware: 731120WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1980 1968 1962 1984 1967 1118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 2,323
Write 2,072
Mixed 1,942
SusWrite 1,830
459% 2,041 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 67.1
230% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,591
DQ Write 1,166
DQ Mixed 1,430
1,055% 1,396 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 337%
Great: 623%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
355GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 171 169 172 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 133
Write 92.4
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 170
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 40.4
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 35.5
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 43.7
104% 36.5 GB/s
Latency 53.8
74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 109%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 120 23.8" 1280 720 ACR082E XV240Y
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback