To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 01:01
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 173
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 451
48% 380 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 0990) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 1.4
4% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800A SSD 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1201A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 73 76 62 62 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 220
Write 83.1
Mixed 111
SusWrite 69.2
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 15.8
65% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 27.5
44% 85.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 60 27" 1920 1017 LEN67B5 R27i-30
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback