Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190116
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 05 '24 at 14:50
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 92.2 1-Core 137 2-Core 263 92% 164 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 829 78% 650 Pts	64-Core 1358 84% 1358 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 8670) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 115 Parallax 134 111% 128 fps	MRender 175 Gravity 130 Splatting 105 108% 136 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,748 Write 550 Mixed 432 196% 910 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 67.1 4K Mixed 36 126% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 811 DQ Write 545 DQ Mixed 679 507% 679 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 438GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 137 Write 137 Mixed 72 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB 4,404 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 108GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 171 Write 35.1 Mixed 37.6 77% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.3 92% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 30,689 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 28.1 92% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 33.9 SC Mixed 26 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 59.6 67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	46	10	165	27"	2560 1369	AUS27B6 ROG PG278QE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,945x
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,637x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $269Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	564x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,332x
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	658x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	648x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	872x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	576x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $55Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	498x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	290x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $167Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	289x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $117Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,319

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359