MSI PRO B650M-B (MS-7E28)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E28
MotherboardMSI PRO B650M-B (MS-7E28)  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 09:08
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$189
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 320
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 679
8-Core 980
104% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,384
86% 1,384 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 102%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 206
Reflection 187
Parallax 205
168% 200 fps
MRender 282
Gravity 161
Splatting 123
146% 189 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 149%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60pnv2t04 TOSHIBA 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: AHGA4103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1677 1707 1576 1596 1596 1610 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,932
Write 2,096
Mixed 1,499
SusWrite 1627
403% 1,789 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 51.8
162% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,437
DQ Write 916
DQ Mixed 1,011
798% 1,121 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 280%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C3016G-BLARBK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 51.8
149% 52.2 GB/s
SC Read 47.5
SC Write 53.2
SC Mixed 49.3
143% 50 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 148%
This bench: 145%
Great: 310%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 180 23.8" 1280 720 AOCB401 24G4
Typical PRO B650M-B (MS-7E28) Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO B650M-B (MS-7E28)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback