MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive402% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E26
MotherboardMSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '24 at 16:42
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$189
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 194
2-Core 383
117% 222 Pts
4-Core 774
8-Core 1,050
115% 912 Pts
64-Core 1,223
76% 1,223 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2661 2669 2676 2588 2592 2672 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
402% Outstanding
Read 1,969
Write 2,664
Mixed 2,224
SusWrite 2643
539% 2,375 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 88.9
316% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,640
DQ Write 1,245
DQ Mixed 1464
1,089% 1,450 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 402%
Great: 417%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
175% Outstanding
MC Read 59.6
MC Write 66.6
MC Mixed 64.9
182% 63.7 GB/s
SC Read 52.4
SC Write 56.1
SC Mixed 59.7
160% 56.1 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 175%
Great: 220%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 55 144 0" 1280 720
Typical B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26) Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,019
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback