TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-17L5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star Katana 17 B12VEK
MotherboardMSI MS-17L5  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 20:49
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 72.8
1-Core 193
2-Core 374
110% 213 Pts
4-Core 715
8-Core 1,106
113% 910 Pts
64-Core 1570
97% 1570 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13C7) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 18.7
14% 19.9 fps
MRender 19.4
Gravity 21
Splatting 16.3
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 14.5%
 Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1562 1441 1435 1560 815 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,434
Write 1,548
Mixed 1,197
SusWrite 1,148
300% 1,332 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 41
256% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 895
DQ Write 572
DQ Mixed 897
625% 788 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑
This bench: 234%
 Great: 234%
Nvme Lexar SSD NM790 2TB
951GB free
Firmware: 11296 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1952 2178 2194 2156 1606 881 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 2,798
Write 2,204
Mixed 1,982
SusWrite 1,828
494% 2,203 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 104
339% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,505
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 1,122
815% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 196% ↑
This bench: 377%
 Great: 626%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548S38-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 60.2
MC Write 54.6
MC Mixed 56.3
163% 57 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 30.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 147%
 Great: 163%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO978F
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-17L5 Builds (Compare 936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17L5

CPU
Core i7-12650HIntelBench 96%, 16,339 samples418x
Core i7-13620HIntelBench 103%, 3,136 samples200x
Core i7-13700HIntelBench 104%, 4,359 samples126x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples238x
RTX 4060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 113%, 18,525 samples233x
RTX 4070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 132%, 10,174 samples214x
SSD
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TBNvmeBench 258%, 5,218 samples156x
SAMSUNG MZVL41T0HBLB-00BTW 1TBNvmeBench 316%, 1,284 samples153x
MZVL41T0HBLB-00BTW 1TBSamsungBench 301%, 609 samples124x
RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples235x
HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GBHynixBench 129%, 4,442 samples199x
HMCG66AGBSA095N 2x8GBHynixBench 129%, 2,777 samples74x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback