OEM X79G

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	OEM X79G (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220825
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 04 '24 at 13:47
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 406 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 51 2-Core 121 48% 79.6 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 399 38% 316 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PowerColor(148C 2335) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.97% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 8.4 4% 5.9 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 3.7 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.97% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg40zns128g NVMe KIOXIA 128GB 1,264 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10410105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 403 254 596 219 220 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 1,054 Write 700 Mixed 532 SusWrite 356 147% 660 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 33.6 109% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 321 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 308 221% 286 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 199%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 453GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 231 234 234 233 234 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.7% Above average	Read 183 Write 223 Mixed 214 SusWrite 231 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 27.3 92% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 192 145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 130%
Toshiba MK2546GSX 250GB-$38 1,044 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 132GB free Firmware: LB012A SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.4 4.5 4.5 3.8 4.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 4.2 Write 5.7 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 4.2 3% 4.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A 1x8GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 5.2 18% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	45	12	60	23.8"	1920 1017	DEL415D DELL U2419H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79G Builds (Compare 354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: OEM X79G

CPU
Xeon E5-2670 v2IntelBench 67%, 831 samples	81x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	73x
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	28x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	41x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	32x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	17x

SSD
512GB 512GBSSDBench 87%, 6,819 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
M393B1G70BH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 49%, 160 samples	37x
M393B1G70QH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 196 samples	20x
M393B5170FH0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 660 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369