PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Intel X79 |
Motherboard | Intel X79G (all builds) |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201228 |
Uptime | 2.7 Days |
Run Date | Mar 20 '23 at 08:48 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | SAU-User |
Background CPU | 75% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 104 92 85 95 MB/s
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
20.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 289x |
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 179x |
Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples | 81x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 57x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 43x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 40x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |