Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 13:18
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 87.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 285
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 848
88% 710 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97%
Great: 105%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 41.3
30% 40.1 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39
Splatting 27.5
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 9.1
5% 8.53 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 12.2
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 422
Write 304
Mixed 218
69% 314 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 17.7
73% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 81.1
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 41.8
42% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 55%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$70
179GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 458
Mixed 342
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 34
113% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 261
218% 316 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 121%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
532GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 65.8
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 104%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$70
570GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 124
Mixed 70.4
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 113%
WD WD101PURP-74B5BY0 10TB
737GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 175
Write 172
Mixed 88
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 1.9
398% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 138%
WD WD101PURP-74B5BY0 10TB
98GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 143
Mixed 98.7
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 1.8
407% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 138%
WD My Book 25ED 4TB
74GB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 133
Write 127
Mixed 106
154% 122 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 1.1
498% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 1.3
444% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 21
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 DELD0A1 SE2717H/HX
Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback