MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 05:24
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 277
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 925
86% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,280
79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1267) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 95.3
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 83.1
78% 89.8 fps
MRender 92.4
Gravity 86.4
Splatting 74
68% 84.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 1TB
571GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFMC0.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1244 1344 974 1027 1006 928 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,335
Write 2502
Mixed 1,738
SusWrite 1,087
378% 1,666 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 80.6
278% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1262
DQ Write 993
DQ Mixed 1,176
867% 1,144 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 256%
Great: 287%
Addlink SATA SSD 1TB
241GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 62 62 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 452
Write 84.9
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 67.8
35% 163 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 2.9
66% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 0.9
39% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
212GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 120 120 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 119
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 33.3
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 34.6
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 3R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 28% 40 214 58 144 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback