MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive511% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 07:21
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 87
1-Core 116
2-Core 274
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 939
88% 729 Pts
64-Core 1,346
83% 1,346 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 875B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 111
Parallax 141
101% 125 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 125
Splatting 106
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
511% Outstanding
Read 5,716
Write 56.4
Mixed 114
SusWrite 29.8
308% 1,479 MB/s
4K Read 692
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 7.3
1,060% 234 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 511%
Great: 488%
WDC WD30EZAZ-22SF3B0 3TB
157GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 82 103 110 103 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 94.2
Write 97.1
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 97.3
20% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.6
17% 6.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 40%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
34GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 204 220 196 148 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 452
Write 463
Mixed 392
SusWrite 185
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 35.5
126% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 307
223% 286 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 95%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
23GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FARG 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FARG 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.9% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 AUS32C3 ASUS VG328
Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $834
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback