Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 02:11
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 191
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 357
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 236
Parallax 174
131% 190 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 129
Splatting 105
114% 145 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 80 188 178 100 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 831
Write 569
Mixed 580
SusWrite 160
119% 535 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 42.2
142% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 521
DQ Mixed 325
268% 375 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 105%
Great: 157%
WD Green 2.5 1000GB
247GB free
Firmware: UW210400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 54 93 56 93 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 378
Write 307
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 95.1
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 8.8
60% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 50.7
DQ Write 81.4
DQ Mixed 4.6
21% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
500GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 84 83 83 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 85.1
Write 97
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 81
113% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.7
242% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 22 165 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G3-
Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback