Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M6500XV
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 20:00
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 61.1
1-Core 192
2-Core 380
107% 211 Pts
4-Core 712
8-Core 1,263
119% 988 Pts
64-Core 1,578
98% 1,578 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 3258) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.8% Very good
Lighting 92.3
Reflection 149
Parallax 87.3
75% 110 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 87.8
Splatting 78.6
83% 105 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1394 1396 1446 1460 280 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,432
Write 1,557
Mixed 1217
SusWrite 999
293% 1,301 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 33.5
182% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 403
DQ Mixed 846
585% 742 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 202%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 43
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 33.9
SC Write 52.4
SC Mixed 43.3
123% 43.2 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 121%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 144 15.5" 1920 1009 CMN1556 N156HMA-GA1
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback