MSI MPG X570S EDGE MAX WIFI (MS-7D53)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive358% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D53
MotherboardMSI MPG X570S EDGE MAX WIFI (MS-7D53)  (all builds)
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 16:15
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 161
2-Core 322
105% 193 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1,081
103% 851 Pts
64-Core 1,484
92% 1,484 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$976
Asus(1043 8962) ≥ 4GB; Asus TUF RTX 4080 Super
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 96
Parallax 137
74% 108 fps
Gravity 307
Splatting 106
169% 206 fps
Poor: 279% Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
479GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2023 1921 1912 2103 2032 2041 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 2,614
Write 2,825
Mixed 2,756
SusWrite 2,005
575% 2,550 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 78.7
250% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,345
DQ Write 1,027
DQ Mixed 1176
882% 1,183 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 358%
Great: 488%
Toshiba HG6 256GB
118GB free
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 382 426 392 109 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 458
Write 431
Mixed 412
SusWrite 300
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 35.2
113% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 226
168% 222 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)
347GB free
Firmware: 101200RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1151 791 844 839 835 843 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,585
Write 1,742
Mixed 1,581
SusWrite 884
326% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 57.2
190% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,385
DQ Write 1,048
DQ Mixed 1,188
896% 1,207 MB/s
Poor: 172%
This bench: 230%
Great: 292%
Lexar NM790 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3229 2834 3143 3196 2572 807 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
440% Outstanding
Read 3,600
Write 3,583
Mixed 2,782
SusWrite 2630
708% 3,149 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 71.4
230% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,617
DQ Write 1,240
DQ Mixed 1,222
970% 1,359 MB/s
Poor: 294%
This bench: 440%
Great: 648%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
434GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 87 87 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 119
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 85.4
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 156 157 162 156 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 95.3
Write 140
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 156
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 54.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 45.3
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.9
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 42.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 117%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 35 180 34" 1280 720 AOCB206 CU34G2XP
Typical MPG X570S EDGE MAX WIFI (MS-7D53) Builds (Compare 1,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570S EDGE MAX WIFI (MS-7D53)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $824
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback