Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 17:17
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 176
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 344
43% 329 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.1% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 34
Parallax 25.6
23% 29.3 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 20.6
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 1TB
691GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 218 217 226 221 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.5% Good
Read 253
Write 235
Mixed 231
SusWrite 215
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 36.6
117% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 186
140% 188 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
59GB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 128 131 130 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 109
Write 101
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 131
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P24HC4U1-B9QS Apacer 76.C102G.D170B 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.3% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 20.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 3R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 12% 51 212 58 60 27" 1280 720 HWP3197 HP 27xw
Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback