Acer Predator GX-792

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAcer Predator GX-792  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Viper2_KLS
Memory34.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180926
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 02:59
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 559
54% 442 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1146) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.2% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 186
Parallax 110
92% 136 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 124
Splatting 114
96% 118 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 327 268 326 291 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 1,033
Write 670
Mixed 448
SusWrite 324
137% 619 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 16.6
80% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 121
146% 253 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 332%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
172GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 426 422 430 448 448 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 449
Mixed 433
SusWrite 431
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 39.3
128% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 302
240% 335 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 101%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.9% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 23.8" 1280 720 DELA0E7 Dell S2417DG
Typical Predator GX-792 Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Acer Predator GX-792

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback