Acer Predator GX-792

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator GX-792  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Viper2_KLS
Memory39.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180926
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 16 '20 at 02:30
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 543
60% 471 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1146) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.8% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 135
Parallax 124
94% 125 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 120
Splatting 105
91% 112 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 652 664 670 668 669 674 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,016
Write 665
Mixed 456
SusWrite 666
156% 701 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 30.5
104% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 316
263% 374 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 131%
Great: 332%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
120GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 444 449 447 448 448 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 450
Mixed 431
SusWrite 444
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 46.6
153% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 347
261% 348 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 110%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator GX-792 Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Acer Predator GX-792

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback