MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 02:07
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 227
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 622
63% 510 Pts
64-Core 629
39% 629 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Lighting 107
Reflection 120
Parallax 91.7
87% 106 fps
MRender 90.9
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 68.4
63% 78.4 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 297 302 297 290 252 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 472
Mixed 400
SusWrite 299
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 51.7
171% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98
92GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 63 69 70 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 439
Write 81.5
Mixed 109
SusWrite 69.6
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 11.9
85% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 1.8
30% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51%
Great: 84%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
211GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 583 605 611 622 621 622 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 669
Write 627
Mixed 648
SusWrite 611
144% 639 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 60
193% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 622
464% 623 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 152%
Great: 365%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
837GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 111 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 116
Write 107
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 110
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELD0DA DELL P2419H
Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback