MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 14:54
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 211
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 585
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.4% Very good
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 112
Parallax 84.9
79% 97.7 fps
MRender 79.9
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 62.9
57% 70.9 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 276 291 286 293 283 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 456
Mixed 371
SusWrite 295
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 49.6
164% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 251
189% 247 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 124%
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98
92GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 70 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 424
Write 87.2
Mixed 103
SusWrite 71.2
37% 171 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 11.2
81% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 98.7
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 12.3
34% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 84%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
215GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 541 577 576 584 221 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 631
Write 580
Mixed 603
SusWrite 448
127% 566 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 42.6
164% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 4.1
DQ Mixed 2.6
24% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 107%
Great: 365%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
837GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 109 110 109 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 107
Write 111
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 110
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1920 1017 DELD0DA DELL P2419H
Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback