Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory43.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 18:42
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 174
2-Core 346
107% 201 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 1365
121% 1,023 Pts
64-Core 2,442
151% 2,442 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 197
Parallax 194
184% 206 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 150
Splatting 132
124% 154 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3000 1465 826 855 714 761 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 3,529
Write 3,758
Mixed 2,615
SusWrite 1,270
626% 2,793 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 80.7
267% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,157
DQ Write 927
DQ Mixed 1058
788% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 348%
Great: 494%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
998GB free
Firmware: SU6SM005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3309 3346 1842 1984 2617 2681 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
409% Outstanding
Read 2,853
Write 3,780
Mixed 2,928
SusWrite 2,630
689% 3,047 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 92.2
290% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,137
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 1,017
748% 988 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 409%
Great: 604%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
805GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 435 446 445 440 387 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 448
Mixed 421
SusWrite 433
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 48.7
158% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 218
164% 221 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
236GB free
Firmware: DC81605
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 391 367 400 396 350 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 490
Write 399
Mixed 293
SusWrite 384
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 34
120% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 143
127% 192 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTRS 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 42.3
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 38.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 122%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 34" 1280 720 GBT3400 G34WQC
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback