Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory53.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 19 '23 at 00:34
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 33.7
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 186
53% 104 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 229
42% 289 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 75.2
Reflection 258
Parallax 552
61% 295 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 224
Splatting 350
193% 216 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 105%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent SB-RKT4P-2TB 2TB
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R4PB47.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1959 2950 2989 3143 3141 2776 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2,368
Write 3,106
Mixed 2,533
SusWrite 2,826
614% 2,708 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 68.4
211% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 339
338% 562 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 364%
Great: 617%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
24GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 428
Mixed 413
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 40.1
130% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 191
131% 163 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
37GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 157 155 157 157 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 154
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 156
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTRS 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 26.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 144 31.5" 2048 1089 MSI1462 MSI MAG321CQR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,090 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback