| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 17.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus Q170M-C (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20190724 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 28 '24 at 08:28 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
64% 112 Pts
|
55% 455 Pts
|
37% 600 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
122%
Outstanding
|
133% 144 fps
|
117% 150 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Netac 1TB 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3618B9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 207 194 281 110 146 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
41% 180 MB/s
|
8% 2.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata AX4U36008G18I-DTBKD3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
63.4%
Good
|
65% 22.9 GB/s
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
52% 76.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 56 | 144 | 27" | 2560 1369 | SAM0F58 C27JG5x |
Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 351 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Q170M-C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 131x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 72x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $77Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 41x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 55x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 24x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 18x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $355 |