Asrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 14:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 70
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 685
66% 542 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 800 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1122B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 415 416 426 453 465 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,386
Write 1,297
Mixed 1,057
SusWrite 435
234% 1,044 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 27.5
118% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 567
DQ Mixed 641
502% 702 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 150%
Great: 383%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U36008G18I-DTBKD3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 32 64 0" 1280 720
Typical A520M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback