Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 22:07
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 45.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
67% 131 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 381
54% 400 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 20.7
12% 16.9 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 13.9
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM256GD3HX015N 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41040C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,229
Write 1,567
Mixed 798
337% 1,531 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 66.5
214% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 668
509% 698 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 272%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
419GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 140 143 141 142 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 103
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 149
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
799GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 167 164 165 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 110
Mixed 103
SusWrite 165
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 109%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
326GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 91 92 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 91.6
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4081CAA2F2HB1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.9% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM071B SMBX2250
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $742
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback