MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 307%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 300%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics299% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive544% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220526
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 17:49
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 322
106% 194 Pts
4-Core 625
8-Core 1,128
105% 876 Pts
64-Core 1,436
89% 1,436 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Lighting 452
Reflection 433
Parallax 466
368% 450 fps
MRender 552
Gravity 370
Splatting 266
309% 396 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 299%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
626GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731120WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3392 3467 3657 3959 3918 3845 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
544% Outstanding
Read 4,203
Write 4,142
Mixed 2,948
SusWrite 3,706
844% 3,750 MB/s
4K Read 73
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 87.7
326% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1315
DQ Write 938
DQ Mixed 1,116
837% 1,123 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 544%
Great: 623%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
348GB free
Firmware: 731120WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1585 2166 2156 2164 2152 1338 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,316
Write 2,255
Mixed 2,090
SusWrite 1,927
484% 2,147 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 83.3
309% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,381
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 1,217
920% 1,239 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 361%
Great: 623%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 85.6
Write 84.5
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 57.1
54% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 52%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
390GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
47% Average
Read 80.1
Write 76.7
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 83.9
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47%
Great: 52%
Seagate FireCuda HDD Hub 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 188 186 184 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 96%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 81 81 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 81.1
116% 88 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 41.2
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 32
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 40.5
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 51.2
78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 170 57.3" 1280 720 HKC3246 NV Surround
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $893
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback