MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 319%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 313%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics308% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive556% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '24 at 12:58
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 98.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 307
104% 189 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,153
106% 889 Pts
64-Core 1,449
90% 1,449 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Lighting 467
Reflection 445
Parallax 478
380% 463 fps
MRender 570
Gravity 383
Splatting 274
319% 409 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 308%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
758GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731120WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3524 3714 3789 3893 3992 3991 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
556% Outstanding
Read 4,242
Write 4,224
Mixed 3,010
SusWrite 3,817
860% 3,823 MB/s
4K Read 76.4
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 89.8
336% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,356
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 1,161
862% 1,150 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 556%
Great: 623%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
653GB free
Firmware: 731120WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1859 2101 2176 2179 2208 2213 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2,459
Write 2,310
Mixed 2130
SusWrite 2,123
508% 2,255 MB/s
4K Read 74.1
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 90.1
324% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,524
DQ Write 1175
DQ Mixed 1274
973% 1,324 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 388%
Great: 623%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 85.3
Write 86.4
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 57.1
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 52%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
390GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 82.7
Write 83.5
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 83.8
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 52%
Seagate FireCuda HDD Hub 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 183 184 184 184 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 195
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 186
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
323% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 109%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 41.8
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 40.6
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 47
85% 47 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 31.5" 1280 720 HKC3246 GA01
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback