MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 306%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 300%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics300% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive552% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220526
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 12 '24 at 12:00
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$290
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 162
2-Core 325
106% 194 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 1,110
104% 866 Pts
64-Core 1449
90% 1449 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Lighting 453
Reflection 434
Parallax 464
369% 450 fps
MRender 553
Gravity 372
Splatting 267
310% 397 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 300%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
763GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731120WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3461 3541 3644 3914 3911 3872 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
552% Outstanding
Read 4,225
Write 4,011
Mixed 2,993
SusWrite 3,724
841% 3738 MB/s
4K Read 74.7
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 92.7
336% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 1,146
865% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 552%
Great: 623%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
569GB free
Firmware: 731120WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2238 2255 2252 2249 2240 2248 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,486
Write 2,346
Mixed 2,104
SusWrite 2,247
517% 2,296 MB/s
4K Read 71.7
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 86
312% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1379
DQ Write 1,163
DQ Mixed 1,262
948% 1,268 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 389%
Great: 623%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 90.8
Write 75
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 57.1
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 52%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
390GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 82.4
Write 84.4
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 83.9
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 52%
Seagate FireCuda HDD Hub 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 186 191 188 185 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 96%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 80 80 79 79 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 78.1
113% 86 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 52.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 41.8
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 40.7
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 170 57.3" 1280 720 HKC3246 NV Surround
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback