Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

19 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.3
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210326
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '24 at 14:02
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Memory 84.3 1-Core 131 2-Core 254 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 674 73% 578 Pts	64-Core 817 51% 817 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1D05 1116) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.92% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 9.4 Parallax 8.5 5% 8 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 11.4 8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.92% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 17,082 User benchmarks, average bench 256% 422GB free (System drive) Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1920 1914 1932 1772 1033 1924 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	296% Outstanding	Read 2,296 Write 1,965 Mixed 1,340 SusWrite 1749 412% 1,837 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 61.4 201% 67.5 MB/s	DQ Read 890 DQ Write 652 DQ Mixed 755 569% 766 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 296% Great: 332%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 531GB free Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1670 1940 2010 617 61 105 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 1653 Write 1,976 Mixed 1,615 SusWrite 1,067 356% 1,578 MB/s	4K Read 49.2 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 66.6 216% 74.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,020 DQ Write 691 DQ Mixed 810 617% 840 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 365%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB 57,752 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.5% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 16.3 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 22.3 66% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	144	17.3"	1280 720	BOE0823

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.3 Builds (Compare 597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 65%

Battle cruiser

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	388x
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	209x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	357x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	240x

SSD
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	136x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	102x
SSDPEKNW010T9 1TBIntelBench 216%, 20,963 samples	98x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	141x
CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 1,244 samples	119x
CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 65%, 1,143 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16