Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 00:45
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 73.6
1-Core 179
2-Core 357
106% 203 Pts
4-Core 699
8-Core 1,379
123% 1,039 Pts
64-Core 2,856
177% 2,856 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
MSI(1462 3882) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 292
Parallax 313
49% 221 fps
MRender 364
Gravity 247
Splatting 187
208% 266 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 102%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC120G1SA754D117-820 120GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 497
Write 153
Mixed 211
62% 287 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 11.1
62% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 137
116% 171 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 83%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
725GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 459 459 459 460 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 455
Mixed 455
SusWrite 459
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 57.1
188% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 210
158% 211 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
234GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 458 456 457 458 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 453
Mixed 406
SusWrite 457
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 58.6
193% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 210
158% 211 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Pcie SSD 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: ECFM52.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2593 2649 2637 2636 2641 2652 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 1,439
Write 2,529
Mixed 1,654
SusWrite 2,635
470% 2,064 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 87.1
294% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,383
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 1,203
906% 1,219 MB/s
Poor: 213%
This bench: 364%
Great: 588%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
524GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 104 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 75
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 102
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 52.6
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 24.4
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 25.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 0P 5R 7G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 15% 74 169 2 60 38.2" 1280 720 ACR0761 X38 P
History: Score 19: 0P 2R 0G 9B | Score 49: 0P 5R 7G 3B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback