Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15P KD

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

21 days ago, 21 days ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15P KD (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211007
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '24 at 16:14
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11800H 56,029 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 70.6 1-Core 112 2-Core 192 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 260 38% 278 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Gigabyte(1458 1533) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1029 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	6.49% Terrible	Lighting 8 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 9.3 6% 9.67 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 1.9 6% 8.73 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.49% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SM2P43A8-001TC2 1TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 347% 499GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2.B.M1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1529 836 722 804 727 806 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 2,066 Write 4,131 Mixed 2,267 SusWrite 904 530% 2,342 MB/s	4K Read 60.6 4K Write 199 4K Mixed 43.4 253% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 898 DQ Write 504 DQ Mixed 660 502% 687 MB/s
Poor: 207% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 489%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 454GB free Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1617 2072 1749 1936 1800 1654 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,305 Write 2,072 Mixed 2,033 SusWrite 1,805 462% 2,054 MB/s	4K Read 62.4 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 24.2 174% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 883 DQ Write 435 DQ Mixed 589 456% 636 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB 3,104 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	67.5% Good	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 14.7 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 14.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	50	16	240	15.5"	1920 1009	SHP14C5 LQ156M1JW03

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AORUS 15P KD Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15P KD

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	237x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	123x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	113x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1x

SSD
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 310%, 6,250 samples	50x
ESR01TBTLG-E6GBTNB4 1TBBench 313%, 1,902 samples	42x
ESR512GMFCM-E8GBTNB4 512GBBench 270%, 620 samples	32x

RAM
CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GBCrucialBench 84%, 3,104 samples	105x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	52x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16