Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15P KD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 15P KD  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 22:21
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 133
52% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 384
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 1533) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 126
Parallax 3.7
3% 44.4 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 1
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P43A8-001TC2 1TB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.B.M1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1618 1007 1040 990 1077 1249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,359
Write 2,692
Mixed 1,678
SusWrite 1,163
391% 1,723 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 36.6
184% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 864
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 517
406% 576 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 207%
Great: 489%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 30
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 24.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AORUS 15P KD Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15P KD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback