Asus PRIME A520M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-K  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '24 at 12:03
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$73
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 221
71% 131 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 431
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Asus(1043 88A8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.9% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 102
Parallax 123
107% 119 fps
MRender 89.4
Gravity 101
Splatting 86.3
75% 92.2 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900KB3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 429
Write 412
Mixed 259
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 34.9
104% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 134
134% 208 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
810GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 182 182 182 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 107
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 181
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 8GBF1X08LFHH35-12-K Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 29.8
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 24.4
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 7 206 58 75 21.5" 1920 1017 AOP0806 22CV1Q
Typical PRIME A520M-K Builds (Compare 1,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $153
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback