Asus ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING  (all builds)
Memory49.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240318
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '24 at 06:43
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 166
2-Core 326
101% 191 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 928
94% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 111
Parallax 117
102% 118 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.4
86% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
709GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1781 1636 1628 1628 1627 1549 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,479
Write 2,293
Mixed 1,838
SusWrite 1,641
463% 2,063 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 72.6
234% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 939
710% 955 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 315%
Great: 410%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2240 2284 2285 2282 2285 2287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,418
Write 2,330
Mixed 2,223
SusWrite 2277
521% 2312 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 80.7
260% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,110
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 972
734% 988 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 361%
Great: 592%
Intel 530 Series 480GB-$322
99GB free
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 226 234 182 184 224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 430
Write 267
Mixed 311
SusWrite 215
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 23.7
83% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 110
93% 138 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 68%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 148 145 146 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 104
Write 96.1
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 146
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 92 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 86.9
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 90.4
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 100%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
9TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 193 191 199 190 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 192
Mixed 202
SusWrite 194
268% 194 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.2
389% 6.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 1.5
360% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 40
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 39.1
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 15 165 31.5" 2560 1417 GSM776F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING Builds (Compare 6,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback