Performance Results

Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 79%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 05:11
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 155
56% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 532
49% 408 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Gigabyte(1458 4112) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 195
Parallax 215
165% 204 fps
MRender 296
Gravity 170
Splatting 127
153% 197 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 149%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1024 940 1136 1226 1192 1140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,335
Write 1208
Mixed 1,282
SusWrite 1,110
278% 1,234 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 27.1
92% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 557
DQ Mixed 746
528% 672 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 178%
Great: 515%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 24
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 15.2
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 23.6" 1280 720 MSI3BB3 MSI G242C
Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 184%
Desktop 104%
Workstation 201%

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback