Gigabyte GA-X570S AERO G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics241% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AERO G  (all builds)
Memory42.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 04:28
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 154
2-Core 300
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 1,003
93% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,753
108% 1,753 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 108%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 23
19% 22.2 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 18.8
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$600
Gigabyte(1458 413A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Lighting 349
Reflection 333
Parallax 334
285% 339 fps
MRender 493
Gravity 281
Splatting 224
259% 333 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 241%
Great: 235%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AF 1TB
455GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6149
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1730 1084 479 707 1040 675 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2215 155 142 111 3018 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
263% Outstanding
Read 2,445
Write 5,452
Mixed 2379
SusWrite 967
637% 2,811 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 51.7
199% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,039
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 1,100
806% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 263%
Great: 263%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SS 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: VC2S Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1260 1271 1282 536 205 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,138
Write 1,330
Mixed 1,051
SusWrite 793
243% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 39.4
140% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 905
DQ Mixed 266
284% 444 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 161%
Great: 288%
Toshiba HDWR11A 10TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 217 219 214 214 210 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 45.5
Write 202
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 215
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-4000 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 26.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 25.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 30 60 27" 1280 720 DELA196 DELL S2721QS
Typical GA-X570S AERO G Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AERO G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,027
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback