HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8309
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 19:46
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 196
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 746
68% 570 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.6% Very good
Lighting 95.6
Reflection 157
Parallax 96.9
78% 117 fps
MRender 92.1
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 93.3
77% 94.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,872
Write 1,031
Mixed 829
273% 1,244 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 57.6
193% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 620
457% 608 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$33
50GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 121 122 113 116 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 115
Write 89.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 116
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
204GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 163 151 150 148 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 120
Write 135
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 152
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 165 143 146 149 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 103
Write 146
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 147
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 90%
WD My Passport 2626 1TB
60GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 74.9
Write 75.8
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 77.8
97% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.2
156% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 29.3
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 24.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 32: 0P 4R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
32% 25% 32 214 58 165 27" 1280 720 ACR0804 ED270R S
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback