Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 17:19
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$410
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 151
2-Core 299
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,132
102% 861 Pts
64-Core 1,948
121% 1,948 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,787
Asus(1043 88EF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 534
Reflection 758
Parallax 810
435% 701 fps
Gravity 574
Splatting 309
372% 442 fps
Poor: 303% Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 1477 1494 1476 1467 1484 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,172
Write 1,913
Mixed 1,616
SusWrite 1,471
402% 1,793 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 58.7
192% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,083
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 429
368% 569 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 265%
Great: 372%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
827GB free
Firmware: 4B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2008 1997 1985 2000 1955 1956 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,495
Write 2063
Mixed 1,690
SusWrite 1,984
410% 1,808 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 63.5
215% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,173
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 959
725% 982 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 292%
Great: 365%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
926GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2253 2114 1440 1430 1454 1423 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,413
Write 1,969
Mixed 1,747
SusWrite 1,686
438% 1,954 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 66.9
227% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,181
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 1,001
746% 997 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 314%
Great: 372%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 50 90 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 17.4
Write 58.2
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 72.5
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0
13% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
912GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 176 174 176 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 119
Mixed 110
SusWrite 175
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.2
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $2,313
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback