Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 17:06
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$410
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 272
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 874
80% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,954
121% 1,954 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,800
Asus(1043 88EF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 468
Reflection 733
Parallax 811
381% 671 fps
Gravity 573
Splatting 270
352% 422 fps
Poor: 303% Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$152
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1303 1359 1361 1510 1507 1399 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,495
Write 1,436
Mixed 1,164
SusWrite 1,406
310% 1,375 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 52.8
169% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 957
DQ Write 671
DQ Mixed 823
612% 817 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 235%
Great: 372%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
827GB free
Firmware: 4B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1492 1703 1428 1489 1805 1479 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1377
Write 1550
Mixed 1,516
SusWrite 1,566
340% 1,502 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 46.9
149% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 750
DQ Mixed 884
665% 896 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 237%
Great: 365%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$152
926GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1744 1752 1510 1401 1393 1291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1,950
Write 1,735
Mixed 1625
SusWrite 1,515
384% 1,706 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 62.1
205% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,113
DQ Write 777
DQ Mixed 937
702% 942 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 276%
Great: 372%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 132 132 133 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 131
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
922GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 176 178 177 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 159
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 174
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 15
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $2,308
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback