Acer Aspire VN7-793G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAcer Aspire VN7-793G  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Neptune_KLS
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '24 at 06:08
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 548
53% 435 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Acer(1025 1155) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.9% Below average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 47.7
Parallax 36.5
35% 42.4 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 38.8
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 885 902 903 911 910 911 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 884
Mixed 860
SusWrite 904
226% 1,011 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 56.1
188% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 223
232% 374 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 189%
Great: 242%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 17.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 17.2" 1920 1080 AUO109D
Typical Aspire VN7-793G Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire VN7-793G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback