MSI MS-16W2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 10UE
MotherboardMSI MS-16W2  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 17:13
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 230
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 461
53% 413 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 30
Parallax 7.5
4% 14.3 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 992 1018 1028 1013 941 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,544
Write 1,042
Mixed 940
SusWrite 843
244% 1,092 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 77.2
264% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 261
286% 479 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 221%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 16GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 18
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 20.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16W2 Builds (Compare 4,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback