Acer Extensa 215-54G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Extensa 215-54G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Jameson_TL
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 12:02
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 101
63% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 458
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 24.5
17% 22.4 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 11.9
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1062 816 800 795 802 801 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,285
Write 2,359
Mixed 1,699
SusWrite 846
403% 1,797 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 88.5
287% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 824
629% 855 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 271%
Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-069.A00G Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.4% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 22
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 16.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO4999
Typical Extensa 215-54G Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-54G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback