Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 424%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 130%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 531%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 133%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics335% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive335% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory41.4 GB free of 48 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '24 at 16:03
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$389
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Memory 86.8
1-Core 246
2-Core 494
141% 276 Pts
4-Core 955
8-Core 1850
166% 1,403 Pts
64-Core 3689
228% 3689 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$982
Asus(1043 8964) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3315 MHz, MLim: 6375 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
335% Outstanding
Lighting 525
Reflection 714
Parallax 529
428% 589 fps
MRender 545
Gravity 426
Splatting 275
324% 415 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 335%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 699 656 651 654 644 601 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
335% Outstanding
Read 2,491
Write 2,358
Mixed 1,634
SusWrite 651
398% 1,783 MB/s
4K Read 74.6
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 106
372% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,862
DQ Write 1,761
DQ Mixed 1,820
1,364% 1,814 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 335%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
382GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 486 459 464 476 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 486
Mixed 468
SusWrite 462
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 63.8
219% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
507GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 486 459 464 476 457 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 474
Mixed 450
SusWrite 462
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 59.4
206% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 342
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
466GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 916 655 656 612 610 610 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,050
Write 1,727
Mixed 864
SusWrite 676
296% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 75.1
276% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,156
DQ Write 1,452
DQ Mixed 869
777% 1,159 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 266%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-8000J4048F242x24GB
2 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
210% Outstanding
MC Read 93.4
MC Write 79.8
MC Mixed 79.4
241% 84.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 51.9
SC Mixed 28.5
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 157%
This bench: 210%
Great: 275%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 43 98 27" 1280 720 AUS27A4 ROG PG27U
Typical ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 2,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $2,450
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback