HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B1D
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 20:19
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 71
1-Core 214
2-Core 422
120% 236 Pts
4-Core 676
8-Core 1,214
114% 945 Pts
64-Core 1,737
108% 1,737 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
HP(103C 8C36) ≥ 4GB;
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 189
Parallax 216
178% 208 fps
MRender 303
Gravity 168
Splatting 126
154% 199 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 156%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1006 1TB
693GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,089
Write 2,351
Mixed 1,983
548% 2,474 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 64.7
229% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,104
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 849
603% 787 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 466%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP52U40S6HM-8FAE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
130% Outstanding
MC Read 55
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 47.1
142% 49.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 48.7
SC Mixed 26.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 130%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 10 144 31.5" 2560 1369 AUS32A8 ASUS VG32VQR
Typical OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback