Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 217% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 225% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	252% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	118.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '24 at 15:21
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 78.5 1-Core 141 2-Core 281 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 539 8-Core 1,014 93% 776 Pts	64-Core 1,487 92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$790 5,026 User benchmarks, average bench 250% MSI(1462 8124) ≥ 4GB; MSI 2070 TI SUPER AERO CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	252% Outstanding	Lighting 375 Reflection 360 Parallax 383 305% 373 fps	MRender 475 Gravity 293 Splatting 229 260% 332 fps
Poor: 233% ↑ This bench: 252% Great: 265%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,400 Write 2,102 Mixed 1,329 431% 1,944 MB/s	4K Read 57 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 73.2 241% 81.9 MB/s	DQ Read 970 DQ Write 658 DQ Mixed 814 607% 814 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 319GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 233 158 158 159 158 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 479 Mixed 395 SusWrite 224 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 46.2 157% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 353 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW128GX4M4D3600C18 4x31.8GB 1,472 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	66.7% Good	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 21.1 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 20.9 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 153%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	164	31.5"	2560 1369	DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $349

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,879x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,614x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $294Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	560x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,306x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	651x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	642x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	859x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	569x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	489x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	280x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16