Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	94.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 months ago, 23 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210712
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '24 at 22:09
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 90.2 1-Core 133 2-Core 265 90% 163 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 839 81% 669 Pts	64-Core 1,068 66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3755) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 111 Parallax 115 97% 115 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 104 Splatting 96.2 90% 113 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 232GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1255 1257 598 587 596 581 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	271% Outstanding	Read 2,540 Write 2,309 Mixed 1,272 SusWrite 812 386% 1,733 MB/s	4K Read 59.2 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 77.2 255% 87.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,023 DQ Write 796 DQ Mixed 883 668% 901 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 271% Great: 340%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 333GB free Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2024 487 224 226 188 238 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	202% Outstanding	Read 1,407 Write 2,067 Mixed 1,582 SusWrite 564 317% 1,405 MB/s	4K Read 53.5 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 71.9 234% 80.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,013 DQ Write 693 DQ Mixed 880 650% 862 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 202% Great: 365%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB 15,164 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF360000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 4.2 9.8 24 21 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 160%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 317GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 4.7 3.2 3 3 3.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 500GB-$89 2,874 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 179GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 67 75 81 78 76 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 3000 DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 3000 32GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 24.7 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 25.3 77% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 37: 0P 5R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
20%	19%	43	214	57	60	27"	1920 1009	HWP2941 HP 2711

History: Score 20: 0P 2R 2G 4B | Score 37: 0P 5R 4G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $191Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,536x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	840x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	584x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	406x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	353x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	346x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $100Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	148x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $642

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16