MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211117
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateApr 08 '24 at 16:12
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 256
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 729
78% 620 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
HP(103C 88D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 156
Parallax 142
128% 152 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 128
Splatting 112
110% 138 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 664 402 401 400 404 403 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,523
Write 1,370
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 446
245% 1,098 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 43
138% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 997
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 964
706% 925 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 171%
Great: 302%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
123GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 279 278 278 280 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 382
Write 338
Mixed 297
SusWrite 289
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 32.6
108% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 231
207% 313 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 118%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
193GB free
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 187 184 203 205 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 377
Write 334
Mixed 174
SusWrite 205
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 11.2
51% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 78.8
DQ Mixed 30.9
41% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 206 206 203 206 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 158
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 206
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1231 488 144 31.5" 1280 720 AUS32B2 ASUS XG32VQR
Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $837
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback