MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211117
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateJan 19 '24 at 17:59
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 261
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 576
70% 539 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
HP(103C 88D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 165
Parallax 152
138% 162 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 129
Splatting 113
111% 140 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 401 399 399 400 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,966
Write 1,762
Mixed 1,249
SusWrite 450
302% 1,357 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 56.1
177% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 910
664% 870 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 199%
Great: 302%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
44GB free
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 162 72 140 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 389
Write 353
Mixed 275
SusWrite 136
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 9.5
56% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 89.9
DQ Mixed 32.3
44% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 61%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
113GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 279 266 177 185 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 429
Mixed 304
SusWrite 235
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 41.5
140% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 216
200% 307 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 210 211 208 211 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 162
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 211
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 118%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 21.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 21.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 46% 26 198 26 144 31.5" 2560 1417 AUS32B2 ASUS XG32VQR
History: Score 34: 0P 4R 3G 5B | Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B
Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $837
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback